Pictures in signatures

[TJ]

Why ?

Not a fan at all.

[Jase]

small ones r ok imo
Any bigger than say the quick reply box is too big, and therefore gay

[Seeker]

Reply that's typed must always be bigger than the signature I reckon, otherwise it turns into a pic fest.

250x80 or 350x100 is pretty good

[Joe]

Too much bandwidth.

[Kilma]

Australia says NO to sig pics.

[Skitzo]

is there any one on hee that has one... actually i recall seeing one.. no make that two. equalizer... and some dude with a 180 getting a bodykit put on..

the same could be said about massive sigs wiht no pics *cough* kilma *cough*.. or sigs with quotes in them

[Kilma]

Pft. That's not a big sig, but just for you, I'll chop out some of the line breaks.

[Skitzo]

see... that looks so much nicer...

[ImPreSiV]

i agree, they look shit

:P

[RICEY]

Dont see the prob if kept small

Yours is too much impresiv with all the text and excess spacing between...

[Onijin]

Pretty sure that with some forums (depending on the software powering it), you can set limits on how big signature pictures can be. If it's an option for this forum, might be worth investigating.

[JME]

Nah its a waste of bandwith and clogs up the pages. Its a form of internet rice, and no-one likes a riceboi!!!

[ben351]

either way there FUCKING ANNOYING !!!!!!!!

[TJ]

Pretty sure that with some forums (depending on the software powering it), you can set limits on how big signature pictures can be. If it's an option for this forum, might be worth investigating.

We can make them obselete, but unlike other ex mods who just went announced things (racism policy anyone) I thought id allow some consensus on this before even talking about it in admin.

It seems that the majority do not favour it.

[Muppet_Guy]

Keep it clean, no pics. I like the way the forums are now, don't need to sift through any rubbish pics to get to read the posts.

[RICEY]

Dont mind small pics but if they go I wont lose any sleep either haha

[ben351]

pics = shit

if you have one then your gay.